srmojumder966
Do³±czy³: 28 Pa¼ 2024
Posty: 1
|
 Wys³any: Pon Pa¼ 28, 2024 07:03 Temat postu: Home Security Dogs VS Home Security System |
 |
|
Why buy a security system if you can get 2 terriers or shepherds who, in case of danger, will quickly scare off the intruder and prevent him from committing a robbery? Every second owner of a private house, cottage, or summer house asks himself this question. There can be no clear answer to it: everyone chooses the option that suits them best. To make it easier, let's compare both methods of protection (dogs for home security and security systems) by 7 main parameters.
Home Security Dogs VS Home Security System from Caesar Satellite
1. Protection at the stage of preparation for a robbery
More than 63% of robberies today are committed according to a pre-planned plan. This is especially true for country cottages. Before breaking into a house, criminals carefully study
object
, possible obstacles to theft. And in this case, guard dogs can really be of great help to the property owner.
According to statistics, 35% of burglars give up on breaking into a house if they discover a dog in the house during the inspection. But only under two conditions:
The house is guarded by at least 2 guard dogs (Caucasian Shepherd, Komondor, Russian Black Terrier, etc.), which roam freely around the yard;
The target is not very attractive to an attacker.
If the dogs are kept in an enclosure or the house has very attractive bait for the intruder, no shepherd dog will scare him away.
But a security system with a camera scares off intruders in at least 55% of cases. Having seen it, a thief will most likely abandon the planned crime. Even if the profit is extremely attractive. A camera is a direct sign that the house is under reliable protection and it is better not to break into it.
Conclusion: Dogs deter thieves 35% of the time. Security systems with cameras deter thieves 55% of the time.
2. Sound "siren" when a thief breaks in
Both a security system and a yard guard dog can scare off an intruder after he has already entered the house:
The dog scares away thieves by barking loudly;
The security system scares off thieves with a siren (if available).
In both cases, there is a psychological impact on the attacker, as a result of which he gets confused and tries to leave the object as quickly as possible. But there is a big difference between such "alarm notifications":
A dog's barking attracts less attention from others. Even if dogs start barking because an intruder is entering the territory, neighbors may perceive this as another false bark. As a result, no one will pay attention to what is happening, will not call the police, and intruders will be able to take advantage of this and complete the crime.
The siren of the security system website development service immediately attracts the attention of those around. It immediately indicates that someone has entered the house. As a result, neighbors call the police, and the intruders do not have time to commit a crime.
Another advantage in favor of the security system is the absence of false alarms. Dogs can bark at cats, birds and other animals that do not pose any danger to the protected property.
Conclusion: Neighbors get used to the barking of dogs and do not pay attention to it. The siren of the security system immediately attracts attention.
3. Actions taken against the offender
The big difference between dogs and security systems is the actions taken when a robbery is attempted:
Dogs - can attack the intruder, harm him. But only under two conditions. Firstly, they must be special breeds of guard dogs, trained accordingly. Secondly, the criminal must be in the field of "action" of the animals. If the intruder thought out his crime in advance, then it will not be difficult for him to bypass the dogs or eliminate them.
The security system immediately reacts to the appearance of an intruder on the territory, sends a corresponding signal to the control panel and thus activates the protocol of actions during a robbery. As a result, within 5-10 minutes a rapid response team arrives at the site and catches the criminals red-handed.
The probability of successfully detaining the perpetrators and preventing theft in the second case is significantly higher.
Conclusion: A dog can harm a criminal. The security system ensures the detention of a criminal with a probability of at least 95%.
4. Effectiveness of property protection
Based on the previous point, it is worth mentioning the effectiveness of both methods in detaining a criminal. A "live security system" in the form of pets can really scare off criminals and harm them. But even the best dogs for guarding a private home are susceptible to elementary poisoning. The criminal, who was once scared off by them, can prepare and return to complete the robbery. There are also known cases when criminals, alas, shot the dog at the scene of the crime.
With a security system, things are not so simple. The sensors are installed in such a way that the intruder cannot immediately determine their presence in principle. Therefore, while he is trying to turn off the alarm, the rapid response team will already be sent to the site. In addition, the security system does not allow the thief to leave. In 95% of cases, the intruder is detained. And if not, then he is quickly found due to the images recorded by video. Also, if the theft was committed, the owner of the object is provided with financial liability from Caesar Satellite.
Conclusion: In practice, the security system turns out to be more effective than protecting the house with dogs.
_________________
website development service |
|
POMOC
Szukaj
U¿ytkownicy
Grupy
Rejestracja
Profil
Zaloguj siê, by sprawdziæ wiadomo¶ci
Zaloguj
